O-ring Handbook

1. Introduction

2. Design and detail information

  • 2.1 Definition of design
  • 2.2 Static seal
  • 2.3 Threaded connectors
  • 2.4 Dynamic (reciprocating) seal
  • 2.5 Drive Belts

 

3. design recommendations

  • 3.1 Static application
  • 3.2 Dynamic seal

 

4. Size list

 

5. Elastomeric sealing compounds

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Basic Elastomer
  • 5.3 Compound Selection
  • 5.4 Compounds
  • 5.5 Col-O-ring-compounds
  • 5.6 Compound selection to SAE and ASTM specifications
  • 5.7 Approvals

 

6. Sealing terminology

  • 6.1 General selection criteria
  • 6.2 Wear
  • 6.3 Aging
  • 6.4Aging tests
  • 6.5 Coefficient of thermal expansion
  • 6.6Compression Set
  • 6.7 Tightness, technical tightness
  • 6.8 ECI, Elastomer Compatibility Index
  • 6.9 Electrical properties of elastomers
  • 6.10 Corrosion
  • 6.11 Gas leackage rate
  • 6.12Hardness
  • 6.13 Joule effect
  • 6.14 Storage, storage time and cleaning of elastomers
  • 6.15 Cross-section reduction caused by elongation
  • 6.16 Surface finish of seal faces
  • 6.17 Friction and wear
  • 6.18 Elongation at break
  • 6.19 Tensile strength
  • 6.20 Stress relaxation
  • 6.21 Rebound elasticity
  • 6.22 Radiation
  • 6.23 Force to deform the cross-section
  • 6.24 Deformation of an O-ring cross section
  • 6.25 Volume change
  • 6.26 Tear resistance
  • 6.27 Tensile set

 

7. Applications

  • 7.1 Automobile industry
  • 7.2 Electronic
  • 7.3 Refrigeration and Climatic technology-Propellants
  • 7.4 Sanitary/Heating
  • 7.5 Gas applications
  • 7.6 Bio-Medical
  • 7.7 Food Industry
  • 7.8 Aerospace
  • 7.9 Nuclear Engineering
  • 7.10 Off-shore technology
  • 7.11 Fungus-resistant compounds
  • 7.12 Environmentally friendly pressure fluids
  • 7.13 Fire-resistant hydraulic fluids
  • 7.14 Compounds for extreme temperatures
  • 7.15 Vacuum Seal
  • 7.16 Semiconductor production
  • 7.17 Chemical Processing

 

8. Parbak® back-up rings

 

9. O-ring failure

  • 9.1 Requirements to be met by O-rings
  • 9.2 Extrusion or clearance gap
  • 9.3 Compression set
  • 9.4 Twisted O-ring, spiral damage
  • 9.5 Explosive decompression
  • 9.6 Wear
  • 9.7 Fitting errors

 

10. Assembly-hints

  • 10.1 Chamfers
  • 10.2 Traversing of cross drilled ports
  • 10.3 Cleanliness and cleaning materials
  • 10.4 Stretching for assembly
  • 10.5 Rolling
  • 10.6 Sharp edges
  • 10.7 Fitting aids

 

11. Standardisation

  • 11.1 O-ring standards
  • 11.2 Other standards

12. Quality Assurance

 

13. Other products

  • 13.1 Rubber molded parts
  • 13.2 Lubrication of O-rings during assembly- O-Lube and Super-O-Lube
  • 13.3 O-ring-Kits
  • 13.4 Parker O-ring measuring cone and measuring tape
  • 13.5 Parker O-ring assembly aids
  • 13.6 ParCoat®  – The smooth approach to O-ring assembly

 

14. Subject Index

 

1. Introduction

O-ring Sealing

An O-ring seal is a means to prevent the loss of a fluid or gas. The seal consists of an O-ring and a metal gland. An O-ring is a circular ring with a circular cross-section moulded from rubber. The gland -usually made from metal -houses the O-ring. The combining of these elements – O-ring and gland – produce the O-ring Seal.

O-ring seals which are effective against fluids or gases are characterised by a lack of leakage. This “no tolerance” can be achieved in different ways; by welding, soldering, brazing, lapped surfaces, or the yielding of a softer material which is partially or totally held between two harder stiffer elements. The O-ring Seal belongs to this latter class. Rubber (or for that matter plastic ma- terial) can be viewed as a non-compressible, viscose fluid with very high surface tension. Because of the O-ring resilience to compression and system pressure (fig. 1.4) a seal is effected.

Advantages with O-rings

  • Wide application range (pressures, tolerances, temperatures, media)
  • Self-sealing and compression-supported sealing effect
  • No retightening required
  • No critical torque
  • Space-saving design
  • No groove splitting required
  • Light-weight design
  • Simple calculation of groove
  • Easy handling and assembly
  • Worldwide availability

O-ring engineering designs are cost-effective

Static Sealing

A static seal is defined as a seal in which all the adjacent sur- faces do not move relative to each other (with the exception of small movements due to fluid pressure).

Examples of static seals are:

The seal under a bolt head or rivet, the seal in a pipe connection, the seal under a lid or plug. It is said of an O-ring “it is the best static seal ever developed”. Perhaps the main strength for this claim is that the O-ring is “fool- proof”. No retightening is required and the human error factor does not exist if the O-ring is fitted in the correct application, in original equipment or during overhaul. The O-ring requires no high loading torque to obtain a leak-free seal. Further detailled information can be taken from section 2.2.

 

Dynamic Sealing

The parts to be sealed move relative to each other in a recipro- cating motion. With this motion the O-ring is displaced. O-rings on pistons or rods in hydraulic cylinders produce dynamic seals. O-rings are most effective when used for short strokes with relatively small diameters. Millions of O-rings are successfully used as dynamic seals in hydraulic or other fluids, or even in compressed air. Correctly applied, their life-span can be that of the equipment in which they are installed. Dynamic seals are influenced by extrusion, respiration, surface finish and hardness Fig. 1.1 / Fig. 1.2 of the seal material. It is important that these factors are taken into consideration during the design process.Further detailled informtation can be taken form section 2.4.

 

O-ring Compound

When choosing an O-ring compound, many factors must be tak- en into account. The medium to be sealed, pressure and temper- ature range are the main factors to be considered. A compound which is optimally suited for steam can be negatively influenced by alcohol or antifreeze in a water cooling system. A compound which is compatible with liquid oxygen at low temperatures can be totally unsuitable at high temperatures, e.g. in air heaters.  All these examples show that the O-ring compound should be chosen according to the specific application. On the basis of the numerous requirements made on an O-ring, the final choice of compound is at best an optimal compromise. To this end Parker offers O-ring compounds for virtually every application, includ- ing military and aerospace. Further detailed information can be taken from section 5. 

inPHorm – PC program for calculation and selection of o-rings

This PC program for calculation and selection of o-rings has been designed specifically for application engineering users.

For many years Parker’s O-Ring Handbook has been a fre- quently used tool for selecting o-rings and compounds. Although this publication provides all essential information, a thorough knowledge base is needed to use this tool correctly. Prior to the introduction of “inPHorm” design engineers had to work their way through calculations of tolerance limits and pore over lists of di- mensions and tables before being able to select the o-ring best suiting their needs.

Thanks to “inPHorm” this is now a thing of the past, at least for the preponderance of o-ring sealing applications. “inPHorm” takes you through the selection process by systematically work- ing out the various process steps involved in your application. Lengthy calculations and searching through tables are now per- formed in a matter of seconds.

Within a few minutes design engineers can determine the correct dimensions of the groove and seal as well as the suitable com- pound. Just open “inPHorm” ...click on “Parameters” ... and the right selection of o-rings will appear on your screen.

If approximate groove dimensions are known for new engineer- ing designs, developers can optimise the design criteria them- selves by entering different groove geometries, i.e. friction can be optimised by reducing compression up to the permissible limit. This eliminates the need to perform tedious calculations of all tolerance limits and leafing through lists of dimensions and media resistance tables as well as the potential for error.

If check as to whether or not an existing o-ring seal design works best is extremely easy as well: just key in the data and “inPhorm” will immediately display the optimum solution.

Direct Quote

* Please note that we maintain a minimum ordervalue of 35,- €.